Parallel Worlds Probably Exist. Here’s Why

  visningar 6,702,778

Veritasium

8 månader sedan

The most elegant interpretation of quantum mechanics is the universe is constantly splitting
A portion of this video was sponsored by Norton. Get up to 60% off the first year (annually billed) here: bit.ly/32SM0yd or use promo code VERITASIUM
Special thanks to:
Prof. Sean Carroll www.preposterousuniverse.com
His book, a major source for this video is 'Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and The Emergence of Spacetime'
Code for solving the Schrödinger equation by Jonny Hyman available here: github.com/jonnyhyman/QuantumWaves
I learned quantum mechanics the traditional 'Copenhagen Interpretation' way. We can use the Schrödinger equation to solve for and evolve wave functions. Then we invoke wave-particle duality, in essence things we detect as particles can behave as waves when they aren't interacting with anything. But when there is a measurement, the wave function collapses leaving us with a definite particle detection. If we repeat the experiment many times, we find the statistics of these results mirror the amplitude of the wave function squared. Hence the Born rule came into being, saying the wave function should be interpreted statistically, that our universe at the most fundamental scale is probabilistic rather than deterministic. This did not sit well with scientists like Einstein and Schrödinger who believed there must be more going on, perhaps 'hidden variables'.
In the 1950's Hugh Everett proposed the Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. It is so logical in hindsight but with a bias towards the classical world, experiments and measurements to guide their thinking, it's understandable why the founders of quantum theory didn't come up with it. Rather than proposing different dynamics for measurement, Everett suggests that measurement is something that happens naturally in the course of quantum particles interacting with each other. The conclusion is inescapable. There is nothing special about measurement, it is just the observer becoming entangled with a wave function in a superposition. Since one observer can experience only their own branch, it appears as if the other possibilities have disappeared but in reality there is no reason why they could not still exist and just fail to interact with the other branches. This is caused by environmental decoherence.
Schrodinger's cat animation by Iván Tello
Wave functions, double slit and entanglement animation by Jonny Hyman
Filming of opening sequence by Casey Rentz
Special thanks to Mithuna Y, Raquel Nuno and Dianna Cowern for feedback on the script
Music from epidemicsound.com "Experimental 1" "Serene Story 2" "Seaweed" "Colorful Animation 4"

Kommentarer
Go to a happy place
Go to a happy place 3 timmar sedan
my other me's can't be as loserish as this worlds one, surely
XaN-ZaN TuG_BuG
XaN-ZaN TuG_BuG 6 timmar sedan
I WoNdEr iF mY pARrAlLeL uNiVeRsE sElF gEtS HiGh WhEN I dO? 🎡🦍👑💨💨🤯 tHe WoRlD mAy NeVeR kNoW!
Moksha Lani
Moksha Lani 7 timmar sedan
Probability is a 2nd dimension of time we are actively experience: is this plausible?? This has bugged me for over a year now. Does anyone know where I can talk to someone with a better understanding of physics about this hypothesis? Even with the internet, I've found it frustratingly hard as an armchair philosopher to provoke even just slightly educated speculations for stupid questions such as this... Details of my hypothesis as follows in a ridiculously long monologue. I am a wordy bastard. Any thoughts at all are appreciated.
Moksha Lani
Moksha Lani 7 timmar sedan
In Many Worlds, I believe that who I think I am here & now, and the me who exists in the parallel uni next door, are actually the same organism with a limited awareness of such, in the same way that the current me is not constantly aware of every moment of my past as vividly as the present; my awareness of the present is my wave pattern collapse, the single point of me that I am capable of measuring right now at any given example of "now." I think I understand that we experience time as a vector (1 direction only) because we are only aware of 1 point of reference to perceive it; 3Ds of space are no problem with 2 eyes, 2 ears & at least 2 points of reference on skin to see, hear, & feel depth of space, but we don't seem to be conscious of experiencing 2 relative points in time simultaneously & therefore miss out on the experience of depth in time. To us it only flows in 1 direction because we can only experience 1 moment at a time. But it never made sense to me that space-time is one noun and yet we only get to experience 1 dimension of time when this hoe space gets 3 Ds. I don't think this is merely because I like symmetry; it makes less sense to me, in a model such as Many Worlds, for there to exist multiple timelines without at least 1 more dimension in time that we actively experience. If time could be thought of in the same symbolic way as space, I visualize it like the y-axis of what could happen is crossing over the x-axis of what we are concretly going to experience; from our relative perspective the axes intersect at the present. Entanglement is a shape of wave pattern interactions on this plane that intersects the vector of our experience, a silly line on the graph, & when this meets the (x,y) coordinates of the present moment is when our measurement is made, the collapse happens, the timelines diverge, and we just ride the time vector we are going to ride. It is like the moment that we open the box & become entangled, however we lack the ability to perceive both outcomes simultaneously, i.e. we again lack the experience of depth in time. As a result, we stay on the x-axis to find out the cat died in this timeline while in an alternative reality that is also diverging from the same point of entanglement, still going along the x-axis however in a tangential trajectory affected by y-axis factors, probability, we are happy to discover the cat alive & well & perhaps feeling somewhat alienated. Is this a plausible way to think of the pattern of quantum probability in the context of the "geography" of timespace, as a dimension of time in its own right, or is this a fallacy? Someone please bring me down to Earth.
Arin Gharibian
Arin Gharibian 7 timmar sedan
It's nice to know that in all those worlds, the earth is still round.
Shin Lona
Shin Lona 7 timmar sedan
A few questions: Is superposition binary? Or are there more than two states? How does entanglement occur? What defines the interaction? Why would the observer open the box and expose himself to the toxic gas?
Stable Stone
Stable Stone 9 timmar sedan
Since, I’m this video example, one radiated molecule can produce a branch of what we preserve. Since almost everything has a level of radiation does that mean every letter I type creates a new branch of existence?
Will Green
Will Green 10 timmar sedan
Everyone is you in a different universe all connected here like a big chat room.. you get to see all your past and future lives in "real time "
U.N. Owen
U.N. Owen 13 timmar sedan
+Veristasium; nice. One problem, though; we know NOTHING about YOUR...CV. - your background. We've no clue who you are - or aren't. Are you a scientist? If so, what kind, and what's your background? Are you; 1) smart? 2) crazy, but sounds intelligent? The biggest problem with the internet's that before, a person's 'voice' , so to speak, was based upon certain measurable quantifiers. A lunatic would quite obviously BE crazy (sorry, I'm not into euphemisms; crazy is DISTURBED). A crazy person would not have the same 'soap box' (platform), so to speak as a learned scientist. That lack of having some discernment has made the lunatics of the world (the paranoid, 'conspiracy' fools) have the SAME sized platform as a legit person (that's why so many... not to bright people believe lunatics. If ''sounding smart' was all a person needed, ...strike that; an idiot combined a lot of not too bright Americans he should be president, and they got tr-mp 😫. SVfrom's a perfect example of what I'm saying. We've no clue who YOU are, nor what your background is. (there's A LOT is crazy's who are intelligent - behind nuts had nothing to do with that. It's the inability to think coherently), so I'll say it again; WHO are YOU? Also, this name, Veristasium; is this from the pseudo-philosophical definition, the ....'monetary' definition, or the Harry Potter? There is an... element of truth here, but it's not clear - ium. As for me, no, I'm not a scientist - professionally. But, I DO have A VERY good eductional background. I'm just saying this because, just like you, I can 'be' whatever I want - as long as you 'sound good', so to speak - that's all that people need (most need even less 😉).
loodog555
loodog555 13 timmar sedan
The most common interpretation of the wave function collapse, which Derek mentions briefly, as the Copenhagen interpretation. This resolves the cat paradox is simply that the detector has collapsed the wavefunction, and that superposition ceases to happen.
Yaswanth Svist
Yaswanth Svist 18 timmar sedan
ok I need two slit screen setup in front of me to multiply myself in one single world.
Ideal hero’s for life Player
Ideal hero’s for life Player 19 timmar sedan
What you said about the cat is was kinda easy EXAMPLE-you have a box you think there is 10 $ in it but until you open it it there could be no money or 5$ or 10$ the . Lol I think about this a lot not joking 🙃 .oh ya I am just 12.and what he meant by measuring one will collapse the other probability is that since you measured it ,it happened if he had not measured it it could have changed and a new result could be the outcome so unless you mesure /know something it is not real.if this does not make sense pleases comment.and different realities are just thing that you or me do different they creat different universes where you do things different .
omar wanace
omar wanace 19 timmar sedan
Why did you have plastic surgery?
Anacleta Nuruddin
Anacleta Nuruddin 23 timmar sedan
The king eternal monarch brought me here🤦🏻
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
WHAT HAVE SCIENTIST DONE FOUND A WAY TO BREAK DOWN CERTAIN PARTICLES IN THE GALLEXY TO SEE IF THEY CAN RECREATE LIFE THEY WANT TO BUILD WORLDS 🌎❤️💦 ONLY ISSUE IF YOU BUILD A WORLD A SUN YOU NEED YOUR OWN PEOPLE SO WITH SHOTS A WAY TO TRANSHUMANIZE PEOPLE LIKE INTO ROBOTS 🤖 THAT THEY CAN CONTROL THE PHYSICAL AND SPIRITUAL AND ALWAYS HAVE WORKERS WORKING BECAUSE YOU CAN PUT ENERGY INTO VESSELS 🚢 CRAZY BUT CLONING LABS 🧫 ARE REAL THEY DO IT ON ANIMALS AS WELL GENE SPLICING BECAUSE THEY WANT A CREATURE WHOS NOT INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO KNOW THEYRE SLAVES RIGHT AND FIGURE OUT HOW TO ESCAPE THE MATRIX AND BE YOUR HIGHER SELF
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
SO IN OTHER WORDS IN ORDER FOR US TO HAVE A PHYSICAL WORLD ONE MUST ALSO HAVE A SPRITUAL WORLD TO BALANCE NOTHING DIES MERELY DEATH REPRESENTS A NEW LIFE ACCORDING TO THE AZTECS AND EGYPTIANS THEY EVEN MUMMIFY BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE LIFE CAN RE ENTER THE BODY LIKE CHRIST WOKE UP SOMEONE FROM THE DEAD LAZERUS INDIANS AS WELL ALSO BELIEVE IN THIS
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
PLANETS ARE ACTUALLY MORE REAL THAN US HUMANS
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
IMAGINE IT ON THIS OTHER PHYSICAL ALSO SPRITUAL WORLD 🌎 THAT MANY HAVE NOT EXSPERIENCED YET BECAUSE YOURE STILL ALIVE RIGHT NOW HOWEVER IMAGINE WANTING TO DIE BECAUSE YOU BEEN DOING THE SAME THING FOR 1,000,000,000 YEARS HOWEVER YOUR’E PERMANENTLY STUCK THERE FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE YOU DREAM AND DONT EVEN GO ANYWHERE IN YOUR’E DREAM INSTEAD YOU JUST SLEEP AND REM TIMES YOU WERE A REAL HUMAN WAKE UP AND REPEAT THE SAME THING EVERYDAY FOR ETERNITY WELL THAT DOESNT HAVE TO BE SOMETHING YOU DREAM THAT WILL BECOME THE OUTCOME FOR MANY PEOPLE 🧒🏻👦🏽🧑🏼👨🧑🏼‍🦱👩🏻‍🦱👱🏼👨🏼‍🦳🧕🏼👲🏾👷🏼‍♂️🧑🏿‍⚕️👩🏽‍🦰👩🏿‍⚕️🕵️‍♂️👩🏼‍🍳
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
🌎🌑🌞☀️⚡️☄️💥🌟🔥🌪💨🌊🌫 IF THEY WERE FORMING FIRST AND THEN CAME 🌳🍀🌴☘️🌲🌵🌱🍀🎍🐲🐉🦚🦜🕊🦃🦩 RIGHT THEN CAME 👱🏾‍♀️👩🏻‍🦱🧑🏼‍🦱🧑🏾‍🦳🧑🏼👩🏽‍🦳🧕🏼👷🏼👷🏿‍♀️👷🏼👷🏼‍♂️👮🏻‍♂️ US RIGHT THAT MEANS WE ARE ENERGY SOURCE TO PLANETS 🪐 ALMOST LIKE THEY CREATED SMALL BATTERIES 🔋 SPRITS CONSTANTLY BEING GROWN AND ALSO YOU LIVE TO DETERMINE WHERE YOU END UP LATER ON SOME CANT UNDERSTAND THIS LOGIC HOWEVER THE EGYPTIANS EXPLAINED ALL ABOUT THE BIRTH OF THE ELEMENTS WATER HEAT FIRE MIDST AND SOLIDS RIGHT AND HOW DARKNESS ALMOST ATE THE LIGHT THE LIGHT REPRESENTED RA OR RE THE SUN GOD AND SET REPRESENTED THE DARKNESS THAT BOTH WAS IN THE PRIMIVAL WATERS SO THEY BELIEVED ENERGY CAME FROM WATER 💦 AND TOGETHER LIGHT PLUS WATER CAME LIFE DUE TO FIRE HEATING IT UP
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
There’s a PHYSICAL YOU HOWEVER THAT ACCOMPANIES A SPIRITUAL YOU DONT GET ME WRONG THEY BOTH ARE THE SAME EXCEPT IN THE PHYSICAL WORLD YOU CAN ENTER PARALLEL WORLD HOWEVER WHEN YOU DIE YOU AUTOMATICALLY GO TO THAT OTHER PARALLEL WORLD THE ONE THAT FITS YOU IF YOU GET WHAT IM SAYING THE HIGHEST POWER WOULD BE A SUN 🌞 THERES NO ELEMENT IN THE UNIVERSE MORE DEFINED AS THE SUN A NATURAL ENDLESS TIME ENERGY SOURCE FOLKS AND EVEN THE ANCESTORS DOGON TRIBE AND EGYPTIANS TAUGHT ABOUT HOW WHEN ONE SUN DIES ANOTHER IS BORN SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE GALLEXY THEY REFERRED TO THIS PROCESS AS THE PHOENIX BIRD RISING OUT OF THE DUST FIRE 🔥 SO LIFE REPEATS ITSELF IN THIS FASHION ONE HAS TO BE PURE LIKE CHRIST TO BE A SUN ☀️ SOMETHING THAT WAKES UP EVERYDAY GIVES LIFE EVERYDAY THE SUN DOES THAT EVERYDAY SO IN THE BIBLE JESUS CHRIST SAID I AM THE LIGHT OF THIS WORLD AND WHAT DO YA KNOW THE KINGS MEN RIGHT SAW A NEW STAR ⭐️ IN THE SKY 🌌 AND KNEW A KING WAS BORN THEY FOLLOWED THE STAR TO BABY JESUS CHRIST YAHUAH MASHIYACA RIGHT THE VIRGIN CHILD 👶🏽 OR SO THE SCRIPTURES SAY SO NOW WE KNOW ASTROLOGY IS APART OF THE BIBLE WHICH WAS THE FIRST RELIGION WAS ABOUT THE BIRTH OF THE PLANETS 🪐 AND HOW SOME ALMOST DIDNT MAKE IT RIGHT ⭐️💫🌙🌎🌟
Karl Shrestha
Karl Shrestha Dag sedan
If this is true, You will see your goddammed Gender swapped you
Kimberly Little
Kimberly Little Dag sedan
I dreamed and saw a parallel world similar to earth where people did the same things they do on earth like work catch trains 🚂 to travel 🧭 and they still had kids there it was there and boom I woke up in the dream before I woke i was still working because it was less speculation you also could take kids to work in this dream and what made the dream significant was that there was another ME OUT THERE ✨✨🌟🌑 and A ME HERE ON EARTH 🌍 THE ME OUT THERE WAS HAPPY TO BE IN A WORLD WHERE THERE WAS LESS VIOLENCE LESS HATE SO IN THE WORLD I DREAMED ABOUT THERE WAS LIKE MINDED PEOPLE THERE WHO ALSO DIDNT HAVE THAT MUCH HATE ENVY BUT JUST WANTED TO GET THE JOB DONE ✅ KIND OF PEOPLE ☃️❄️🌧
a2b
a2b Dag sedan
God be like: git clone
a2b
a2b Dag sedan
As you were talking about the world being duplicated every single instant I was thinking about how bad God is at computer science with this disgusting O(infinite). The universe probably has an infinite RAM then
happynuggets459 ___
happynuggets459 ___ Dag sedan
I have no idea how I got here, but I'm here
NessaOfDorthonion
NessaOfDorthonion Dag sedan
Woah. The wave representation for the double slit experiment of it has totally blown me away because now I actually understand what's happening and it gave me chills
steve heslop
steve heslop Dag sedan
Whoa!
Jodi Vorpahl
Jodi Vorpahl Dag sedan
A world is born with every birth..we are nine billion worlds based on how others see us and when one of us dies two more new souls are born into two new and connected worlds..because we only use a small portion of our minds we only see ourselves in one world at a time separate from each other even though we're in as many worlds as there are people
Jack TD Pie The Suppressed NINRAI
Jack TD Pie The Suppressed NINRAI Dag sedan
hey i have that same shirt you were wearing with the scientist man guy person
Wayne Keenan
Wayne Keenan Dag sedan
Oh no, I just branched into a universe where parallel worlds do not exist. Am I stuck here now?
Chris Chiesa
Chris Chiesa Dag sedan
I find this description pretty straightforward except for two things. First, I still have difficulty with conservation of energy. I understand this video to say that energy is conserved in the overall, *many worlds*, wave function (the "bigger picture"), which makes sense at face value. But if each split creates a whole new universe as an exact duplicate of the "original," surely each post-split universe contains the same amount of energy as the original -- which seems to mean *doubling* the amount of energy present "in the big picture" of just the original universe, "before and after." If energy really is conserved, the duplicate energy would seem to have to "come from somewhere" -- in particular, somewhere external to both the original universe and either of the post-split universes. This seems to require/imply a "pool" or "reserve" of energy, somewhere, from which to draw. The possibility that the rate of splitting might be infinite seems to further require that the pool might also have to be infinite. On the other hand, while writing that paragraph, something else occurs to me. There is one value, for the energy of the universe, that can be split indefinitely *without increasing* -- namely, *zero*. Zero energy in the original universe, and the same in each of *two* universes post-split, poses no problem at all, anymore. Now consider: I've read that when one calculates the *total* energy of our universe, one *does in fact* find that it "is almost zero, and *may actually be exactly* zero." I hereby suggest that the many-worlds interpretation may predict/imply/require that, and/or explain why, the total energy of the universe *must* be exactly zero. Remember, folks, you heard it here first. Second, what about the double slit experiment? If the explanation for e.g. "an electron going through both slits at the same time" is that "it really only goes through one slit in one universe, and the other slit in another universe," then it seems to me that we shouldn't see an interference pattern in any *one* universe, *at least and especially* when the electrons are fired through the apparatus *one at a time*. What am I missing?
ShutterGuts
ShutterGuts Dag sedan
We have a limited view. We think in time which doesn't exist in the quantum realm. So it doesn't need to split branches it just is at any given moment what it needs to be.
King Donut
King Donut 2 dagar sedan
How I understand quantum entanglement because I’m dumb... I say that my house is gonna catch on fire now so it would be very odd if it happened but if someone decided to burn down my house it would not be affected by me saying it would happen yet it’s more unlikely to happen because I said it
Wasp
Wasp 2 dagar sedan
This is so confusing... I love it
Tanmay Jain
Tanmay Jain 2 dagar sedan
.....Bruh.
SpoopyTrashBag
SpoopyTrashBag 2 dagar sedan
so no one gonna talk about that cat at the begining?
Harshal Sardesai
Harshal Sardesai 2 dagar sedan
This is why we are a simulation no 2 people have the exact same story of life it is controlled we are really not living in probability.!! We are studied from a distance from someone giving different people different conditions and checking their outcome.
CIRZETT
CIRZETT 2 dagar sedan
Thanks for that last comment, which if I understood correctly, meant that this idea is only about math and making sense out of an equation. He clearly (?) said that there is not actually multiple worlds and multiple versions of you in separate universes, only a "convenient" way of making predictions in our one and only universe. "a convenient description" but "It's not built in to the fabric of reality itself"
Perberos
Perberos 2 dagar sedan
Este video es una perdida de tiempo, al igual que ir a buscar una estrella distante y descubrir que todo este tiempo solo era una proyección de la luz y que dejó de existir hace muchos años atras... u_u
The Business Owner's Executive Coach
The Business Owner's Executive Coach 2 dagar sedan
Is it consistent with the theory to say, "When I open the box and observe a living cat, my consciousness is experiencing a branch in which the atom did not decay AND that a distinct branch of this consciousness (with an identical "past)" is inhabiting a branch in which the cat is dead. ???
Jacinth Debbarma
Jacinth Debbarma 2 dagar sedan
Every second we're creating another parallel branches as it's infinite, and that makes 7 billion people making 7 billion different infinite universe in infinite multiverse.
zachary ulp
zachary ulp 2 dagar sedan
So this is why we age. When the wave function collapses into two separate choice universes it is less than the original. His words, so each decision we make makes us older.
zachary ulp
zachary ulp 2 dagar sedan
But, why don't we experience both wave functions once split? And why do I only remember one and who is the other observer if not me?
Noel Ceballos
Noel Ceballos 3 dagar sedan
Yes, I understood some of these words
DJatVRR
DJatVRR 3 dagar sedan
This is why Trump is correct. He did win.
dcpinapels
dcpinapels 3 dagar sedan
I’m watching this at like 1 am
Berserk Berserk
Berserk Berserk 3 dagar sedan
"abortion in this video is sponsored by... " this is what i heard.
Mack Carnes
Mack Carnes 3 dagar sedan
I don't understand what is going on but it's interesting
Vivek Reddy N.C.
Vivek Reddy N.C. 3 dagar sedan
Video duration before playing- 20 minutes Video duration after playing- 19.59 minutes.. It both 20 and 19.59 Schrodinger's video indeed🤣🤣
TheSupermUniverse100
TheSupermUniverse100 3 dagar sedan
0:30 All physics majors are getting flashbacks
Art Alagao
Art Alagao 3 dagar sedan
Meanwhile, In a parallel universe... "Where are all these socks coming from?!?! And why are they all left ones🤔
Erik Erikson
Erik Erikson 4 dagar sedan
Schrödinger's Cat can't work. Because of the Sensor forcing the radioactive Atom to decide if it's either decayed or not. The Principle isn't wrong. Just the Experiment doesn't work.
Joe R
Joe R 4 dagar sedan
Meanwhile, In a parallel universe... "Why is my floor always getting dirty with Cheetohs?!?!?!"
Joe R
Joe R 4 dagar sedan
This is the only channel that gives me a big freakin headache every time I watch it, but I still can't stop watching. LOL!
Daniel Röder
Daniel Röder 4 dagar sedan
Another problem i see with schrödingers cat is, that we assume a system that is totally disconnected from our universe, that suddenly connects when we open the box, when in reality it's not possible to isolate any part of the universe from the rest (Except maaaaybe blackholes)
††fourmula††
††fourmula†† 4 dagar sedan
the world iz flat and on the other side a paralel universe
Isaac Johnson
Isaac Johnson 4 dagar sedan
Wow the multiverse is an infinite dimensional Hilbert space with universes as orthogonal basis!
anthony boschert
anthony boschert 4 dagar sedan
So the universe was created and not created at the same time?
anthony boschert
anthony boschert 4 dagar sedan
What I mean is that everything doesn't exist if it is not observed?
Varsity Chap
Varsity Chap 4 dagar sedan
Is constant decoherence the reason for entropy?
Amitrius Robinson
Amitrius Robinson 4 dagar sedan
Shifting realities like 👁👄👁
Ratko Santrac
Ratko Santrac 4 dagar sedan
I wonder if there is a world in which i am not a looser...
ThatOnePeskyFox
ThatOnePeskyFox 4 dagar sedan
The universe must have some GREAT hardware, running all of those parallel universes at once without lag.
A random Artist
A random Artist 4 dagar sedan
Whait so my mom is dead in an alternate universe, And my grandma could be alive in an alternate universe?!?!
dhruba yeah
dhruba yeah 4 dagar sedan
What if i say probability is conserved.
twalrus1
twalrus1 4 dagar sedan
I'm with you on the infinite universes. BUT, my mind says that it's very inefficient and the universe tends to be very efficient. It sounds like when Mickey Mouse made the brooms multiply. Somebody or something has to come in and make them all disappear to set things in order.
Molten Guava
Molten Guava 5 dagar sedan
That is ridiculously beautiful!
POLISH COW
POLISH COW 5 dagar sedan
There is a version of me who is smarter than Shrodinger
D9P R6
D9P R6 5 dagar sedan
Brain.exe has left the chat*
Daniel Chand
Daniel Chand 5 dagar sedan
I rather live in the universe where Prof. Sean Carroll is president that the one I'm in now.
Tiga UltraSuperiorGojira
Tiga UltraSuperiorGojira 5 dagar sedan
So things don’t just branch when it’s only equally possible, however unlikely a possibility is it still occurs in some other reality, but is each split binary? Or definite or is it indefinite and what determines the one we experience random chance? That still adds a bit of probability to the situation not with how things work but with what is relevant to a human
Razzan悲
Razzan悲 5 dagar sedan
*How many universe you see ?* Infinite . *How many universe where doom defeated?* Zero.
Ade hernandez
Ade hernandez 5 dagar sedan
There are infinite worlds and versions of everyone for example 'someone that is a doctor could be a killer or like someone who is a cop could be a singer' or it could be the same just a little bit more different what also is different is ur personality u can be nice and sweet but in another parallel world u can be harsh and curl even places are like say burger King is at the end of ur neighborhood but in another parallel world it could not be even there it trippy.
yidon yang
yidon yang 5 dagar sedan
no parallel world do not exist if so there would be infinite matter and basic chemistry teaches you there is a limited amount of space time and amount of extra mass not consumed by the big bang youre actually stupid for trying to prove something wrong thats been known to be wrong since matter was first being studeiyed and the probability whta you said is completey wrong and so is squaring it and there is no extra outcomes
Joe
Joe 5 dagar sedan
This is 2 dudes who i could listen too all day
Augusto Mazzei
Augusto Mazzei 5 dagar sedan
No cat was injuried in making this video
Kian Curatolo
Kian Curatolo 5 dagar sedan
I always find it funny to know that according to the interpretation there's a universe where every coin toss from the year 2000 onwards only came up tails. I mean it's not a high chance but there's at least one universe like that. Extreme of thisthere universes that by pure chance seem to in all situations obey different physical laws. for example, a universe where every quantum behavior acted exactly as classical theories precited hiding quantum mechanics from them.
Vince : D
Vince : D 5 dagar sedan
Is there a universe with no parralel universes
edgelord supreme
edgelord supreme 5 dagar sedan
im just a weeb hoping
capped baldy
capped baldy 5 dagar sedan
One has girlfriend
Pragati Sheoran
Pragati Sheoran 5 dagar sedan
If someday I meet someone from a parallel universe, will that person be called an alien?
Bogdan Vassilieff
Bogdan Vassilieff 6 dagar sedan
There are N contenders, for: the same position. They are all entangled together. Decoherence occurs when the candidate has been chosen. Here, the reduction of the wave packet is: selection.
Bogdan Vassilieff
Bogdan Vassilieff 6 dagar sedan
Quantum, in real world (at human scale) : You're walking; you see someone (something), far away. You can't distinguish yet. You cannot know; you assume that. It's probable ... or not = The wave function. The said person (thing) vaguely makes you assume of someone/something ... or not : The probability increases/decreases. The more you walk; the closer you get to him/her/it : The probability increases/decreases, even more. To a certain point; where something fixes your knowledge : It's him/her/it ... Or, no. Probability is no more, it has collapsed : ... into a certainty.
Bogdan Vassilieff
Bogdan Vassilieff 6 dagar sedan
Another example : Starting grid : Entanglement. Race : Decoherence Positioning : Reduction of the wave packet Until the first one arrives, they are all: winners AND losers But, there can be only 1 winner. They're all entangled.
Bogdan Vassilieff
Bogdan Vassilieff 6 dagar sedan
Example : There are N contenders, for: the same job. They are all entangled together. Decoherence occurs when the candidate has been chosen (Here, the reduction of the wave packet, is : the selection).
Felipe Gaete Román
Felipe Gaete Román 6 dagar sedan
I imagine these "Parallel Worlds" are many 3 dimensional worlds forming the 4th dimension, just like many 2D "planes" form our 3 dimensional world. This explains why entangled particles seems connected, but I think we observe them in different 3D realities, and in every reality their quantum state have different values. So from our "single world" perspective it seems that one reacts from the other, but their real state does not change, but have different values in different realities. I think we experience different realities each millisecond, that's why we cannot predict electron position just a probability, because the electron is located in different positions in different 3D realities.
Arne Vajsing
Arne Vajsing 6 dagar sedan
Why must the cats die? Dont you believe in peace and kindness?
Robert Lewis
Robert Lewis 6 dagar sedan
Doesn't work theologically as I understand this theory.
notpyro
notpyro 6 dagar sedan
Quantum is very weird
Bogdan Vassilieff
Bogdan Vassilieff 6 dagar sedan
Quantum, in real world (at human scale) : You're walking; you see someone (something), far away. You can't distinguish yet. You cannot know; you assume that. It's probable ... or not = The wave function. The said person (thing) vaguely makes you assume of someone/something ... or not : The probability increases/decreases. The more you walk; the closer you get to him/her/it : The probability increases/decreases, even more. To a certain point; where something fixes your knowledge : It's him/her/it ... Or, no. Probability is no more, it has collapsed : ... into a certainty.
xIvy
xIvy 6 dagar sedan
Why are there so many German scientists that achieved something lol. Just curious.
Zachary’s Amazing World
Zachary’s Amazing World 6 dagar sedan
BOY DO I HATE HOW YOU STARTED THIS VIDEO!!! NEVER WATCHING A VIDEO MADE BY U AGAIN I LOVE CATS... AND U KILL AN ANIMATED CAT
Luca Ibrahimovic
Luca Ibrahimovic 6 dagar sedan
Brainf*ck
Sadman Sam
Sadman Sam 6 dagar sedan
Sceintists : explaining how double split experiment reveals the quantum Universe Also Sceintists : For one last time, The Earth's Is Round
OneGladAnt hs
OneGladAnt hs 6 dagar sedan
Hi
nasa1954
nasa1954 6 dagar sedan
The Doc explained that there was no problem with the conservation of energy, but didn't explain where the matter comes from to create new universes instantly. Can someone explain?
Words of Cheresie
Words of Cheresie 6 dagar sedan
There is a huge problem: All of this is speculation and there is no experimental evidence of multiple universes. For the moment, this whole discussion is closer to religion than science. Multiple universes, string theory, and branes are not science, but religion-like speculation. Just because math is involved, does not separate this discussion from religion.
Words of Cheresie
Words of Cheresie 6 dagar sedan
I will add, there are some emotionally appealing things about the many-world interpretation, but it should be clear to any thoughtful person that quantum mechanics is a very incomplete theory and we will not get very far until we can come up with experiments that confirm our models. Currently, quantum mechanic "research" is mostly baseless speculation. I believe that this speculation is valuable because one day it will probably result in good experiments and good science, but for now, it cannot be taken very seriously.
Alan Augusto Silva Sousa
Alan Augusto Silva Sousa 6 dagar sedan
But first, we need to talk about parallel universes.
ash0787
ash0787 6 dagar sedan
but the mandela effect is fake false memory ? what a bizzare juxtaposition. science keeps moving the goalposts whenever something occurs which doesn't fit the already well established rules, then it tells people they are wrong for believing anything which is outside of the rules of science, what a joke. If the system gives out information, especially for free, it often means that information is not worth knowing.
Flying Fox
Flying Fox 6 dagar sedan
So if I understand Sean Carrol correctly, there aren't really many parallel universes? Fundamentally, there is just one universe, but we just observe a single sliver of it.
Saul Goodman
Saul Goodman 6 dagar sedan
Meanwhile, in a parallel universe: **STRENG GEHEIM**
Juan P. Perezchica
Juan P. Perezchica 6 dagar sedan
Math is an approximation of reality. Math is not reality. Math is a human tool that we use to understand reality, but this tool has limitations and fails regularly.
Quantum Reality: Space, Time, and Entanglement
1:32:49
World Science Festival
visningar 3,4mn
AlphaGo - The Movie | Full Documentary
1:30:28
Skarpskytt
3:22
Försvarsmakten Inblick
visningar 112tn
Dude Perfect Corn Maze | Nerf Battle
6:54
Dude Perfect
visningar 3mn
The Science Behind the Butterfly Effect
12:51
World's Lightest Solid!
12:02
Veritasium
visningar 24mn
Why do prime numbers make these spirals?
22:30
Does Planet 9 Exist?
16:20
Veritasium
visningar 4,1mn
The Infinite Pattern That Never Repeats
21:12
Multiverse: One Universe or Many?
1:22:35
World Science Festival
visningar 1,8mn
Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists
1:28:23
Microsoft Research
visningar 894tn
Skarpskytt
3:22
Försvarsmakten Inblick
visningar 112tn
Dude Perfect Corn Maze | Nerf Battle
6:54
Dude Perfect
visningar 3mn
STÖRIG SPÖK-KOSTYM
3:35
IJustWantToBeCool
visningar 86tn
Skarpskytt
3:22
Försvarsmakten Inblick
visningar 112tn
Arıza 11. Bölüm
2:21:16
Arıza
visningar 942tn
Crew-1 Mission | Launch
4:33:15
SpaceX
visningar 5mn